Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joan Tollifson's avatar

I received a private message in response to this post that said: "Do you really believe the body is conceptual? What does that mean? It worries me that people's increasing disconnection from nature, including their own nature and their own bodies is causing suffering to humankind and the earth. I don't believe my body is any more conceptual than my dog's body, or the tree outside my window! Insight into the impermanence and interconnectedness of all does not, in my opinion, require us to conceptualise out of reality the infinite wonders of fingers, flowers and frogs."

In case anyone else had a similar reaction, this was my reply to this person:

I was actually hoping my post would validate the "infinite wonders of fingers, flowers and frogs,” not invalidate any of it! I was by no means suggesting that your body, your dog, or the trees are unreal or that there is nothing there other than a mere concept. What I was attempting to point out was that all the “things” we can name are in some sense conceptual abstractions mentally carved out of an ever-changing, flowing, boundless aliveness (the sensory world). I’m not negating the actuality of any of this—quite the opposite. I’m saying that “Your body,” “Your dog,” and “the tree outside your window,” are word-labels that describe a living actuality that never really holds still. Nothing can actually be pulled out of the whole. We learn to label and categorize things: body, dog, tree. This is, of course, functionally useful and necessary, and I’m not denying the relative reality of these “things” that we’ve learned to see and identify. The recognition of thorough-going impermanence and interdependence doesn’t in any way negate the beautiful and unique particularity of you, your dog, and that particular tree. It simply invites the recognition that the world is not actually made up of a bunch of separate objects. It is one whole undivided aliveness. Your body, like the body of your dog, is constantly changing. It doesn’t hold still. It can’t be separated from everything that is supposedly “not it."

If we imagine that the world is made up of a separate ”things,” and that these “things” are all impermanent, this is not yet the full understanding of impermanence. The flux is so thorough-going that no separate, independent, persisting “things” ever actually form and persist to be impermanent. When we really grok this, it doesn’t diminish our love for our dog or our appreciation for each unique and precious expression, each unique waving of the vast ocean. It actually opens up the sense of being this whole body-mind-world.

In pointing out the dualistic division in so much of spirituality between body/mind, matter/spirit, etc., I was attempting to suggest that this division is false and, as you say, I agree that it is contributing to humanity’s increasing disconnection from nature and the harm that flows from that lack of sensitivity. Along those lines, I highly recommend a book by David Hinton called Wild Mind, Wild Earth: Our Place in the Sixth Extinction. Hinton is a poet and a translator of early Chinese poetry and Chan (Zen) and Taoist texts. He’s written many great books, but this one specifically addresses this issue. (He’s on my website recommended books list where you can learn more about him if you’re interested).

Expand full comment
Carol Hayward's avatar

Beautiful 😍 😍 😘

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts